Make a donation
Укр / Eng
17.02.21

What’s the quality of the water we use? How safe is it for our health? These questions should be answered with the use of data from the state water quality monitoring, the procedure of which was approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine back in 2018. However, there’s still no state monitoring program.

Anastasia Bondarenko, legal analyst at the Right to Protection CF, commented on this

Анастасія Бондаренко якість води water quality

«Ukraine is actively developing a water quality monitoring system. Surface waters are the main source of drinking water in many regions of Ukraine (for example, in Donetsk and Luhansk regions, where its sources are the Siverskyy Donets and groundwater). Surface water monitoring programs in accordance with European standards are successfully implemented by the Siversko-Donetsk Basin Administration. But as the workers themselves admit, not all water sources have enough equipment and funding is provided mainly through international support programs. But the situation with groundwater monitoring is much worse.»

According to the State Ecological Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management and the implementing organization OpenAccess Environment, which was responsible for the implementation of the «Open Environment» program of the on-site water quality and level of groundwater monitoring. In November 2019 the submission of information must have started as a part of the water quality monitoring system but as of now it is still in development.

Significant percentage of the water supply in both regions was damaged by hostilities. According to the expert, wells remain the only source of water supply for many locals. Most mining towns and villages are located directly above the clearing. Therefore, the chemical composition of water in wells is affected not only by the composition of mine water but also by their level.

Якість води на Донбасі Water quality Donbas

Unfortunately, we have to state that systematic monitoring of mine waters is not carried out at the moment. The situation is particularly difficult in cities associated with mines that are flooded in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Ukraine, such as Zolote and Toretsk. 

Enterprises located in the controlled territory, according to the state account of water use, only in Donetsk region in 2019 carried out dumping of mine and quarry waters to surface water objects of the Kazeny Torets river basin (Siverskyy Donets river basin) in volume of 17.05 million square meters without quality category. And this is only the data on 10 coal industry enterprises.

water quality якість води

According to the State Institution «Donetsk Regional Laboratory Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine» in 2019 they have conducted 11860 studies of drinking water quality from the decentralized water supply for sanitary and chemical indicators. Deviations from sanitary norms – 16.7% (against 12.6.0% for the same period last year) out of more than 11828 studies of drinking water of decentralized water supply for nitrate content. Deviations from sanitary norms – 46.1% (against 11.6% for the same period of the last year) due to decrease in research against last year’s level.

«The consequences of the lack of water quality control, the inability to promptly and adequately inform the public about the state of technical and drinking water as well as the threats to the use of such water for health violate the rules of Art. 50 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which stipulates that everyone has the right to a safe environment for life and health and guarantees everyone the right to free access to the information on the state of the environment, the quality of food and household items,»

– sums up Anastasia Bondarenko.

Read also:

16.02.21

Today we present the report ‘Crossing the contact line’ for January 2021, prepared by the NGO ‘Right to Protection’. The report is based on data collected during the monitoring of the situation on EECPs. More statistical data is available on the Eastern Ukraine Checkpoint Monitoring Online Dashboard.

HIGHLIGHTS:    

  • During the month, crossing the contact line remained possible only through two EECPs: Novotroitske in Donetska Oblast and Stanytsia Luhanska in Luhanska Oblast, at a level considerably below the preCOVID period. The number of people crossing the contact line decreased in January compared to December by 43 percent due to the winter holidays: 27,480 and 48,000 respectively.
  • On 5 January, the Cabinet of Ministers adopted changes to Resolution №1236, according to which it is allowed to test persons arriving from NGCA for COVID-19 not only by PCR, but also by using a rapid antigen test. Donetska and Luhanska Regional State Administrations were instructed to ensure the functioning of necessary testing points at EECPs. The rapid test will be free of charge for Ukrainian citizens. The tests were purchased at the expense of the state budget, the Ministry of Health signed an order on the distribution of 1.8 million tests. In case of a negative result, the data is automatically displayed in “Vdoma” app and the person is released from self-isolation. As of the end of January, 156 people took advantage of the opportunity to pass a rapid test for COVID-19 at Novotroitske EECP. Meanwhile, Stanytsia Luhanska EECP was not provided with rapid tests, therefore people crossing the сontact line in the GCA direction at Stanytsia Luhanska EECP had to pay for passing PCR test in two private laboratories located at the EECP.
  • Out of those surveyed for 83 percent cash withdrawal was the main type of service they used at Stanytsia Luhanska EECP.
  • Of those respondents who were concerned about any issues, the majority of them cited possible issues with a permit as the main reason for their concern. This may be caused by the fact that people faced with a complex procedure of document submission as at Novotrotske EECP. Besides, 30 percent of those respondents claimed the lack of physical distance as a reason for their concern.
  • During the month of January, 3,695 vulnerable elderly persons were provided with transport support at Stanytsia Luhanska EECP by the NGO “Proliska” e-vehicle. 

The report is available in English and in Ukrainian


The report is based on the results of a survey conducted by R2P at the five EECPs to enter the NGCA and administered on a regular basis since June 2017. The survey is a part of the monitoring of violations of rights of conflict-affected populations within the framework of the project ‘Advocacy, Protection, and Legal Assistance to IDPs’ implemented by R2P, with the support of UNHCR. The purpose of the survey is to explore the reasons and concerns of those traveling from the NGCA to the GCA, as well as conditions and risks associated with crossing the line of contact through EECPs. The information collected in the survey helps identify protection needs, gaps, and trends, and provides an evidentiary basis for advocacy efforts. 

Also read:

16.02.21

До вашої уваги – моніторинговий звіт «Перетин лінії розмежування через КПВВ» за січень 2021 року, підготовлений БФ «Право на захист» на основі даних, зібраних під час моніторингу ситуації на КПВВ. Більше статистичних даних можна знайти за посиланням.   

ГОЛОВНЕ:    

  • Протягом місяця, перетин лінії розмежування можливо було здійснити лише через два КПВВ: «Новотроїцьке» в Донецькій області та «Станиця Луганська» в Луганській. Це призвело до зменшення кількості перетинів порівняно з періодом до введення карантинних обмежень. Загальна кількість перетинів лінії розмежування знизилася на 43%  у січні проти грудня (27 480 та 48 000 відповідно), що може бути пов’язано з зимовими святами.
  • 5 січня Кабінет Міністрів ухвалив зміни до Постанови № 1236, згідно з якими допускається тестувати осіб, які прибувають з непідконтрольної території на COVID-19, не тільки методом  ПЛР, а й за допомогою експрес-тесту на антиген. Донецькій і Луганській облдержадміністраціям доручено забезпечити функціонування пунктів тестування на КПВВ. Проведення експрестесту є безкоштовним для громадян України. Тести закупили коштом держбюджету, МОЗ підписав наказ про розподіл 1,8 млн тестів. У разі негативного результату дані автоматично відображаються в додатку «Вдома», і людина звільняється від самоізоляції. Станом на кінець січня, 156 осіб скористалися можливістю пройти експрестест на COVID-19 на КПВВ «Новотроїцьке». Тим часом, КПВВ «Станиця Луганська» не було забезпечено експрестестами, тому люди, які перетинають лінію розмежування в напрямку ПУТ на КПВВ «Станиця Луганська», можуть пройти тільки платний ПЛР-тест в двох приватних лабораторіях, розташованих на цьому КПВВ.
  • Згідно з опитуванням, основним видом послуг на КПВВ «Станиця Луганська», яким скористалися 83% людей, було зняття готівки.
  • Більшість тих респондентів, які були стурбовані будь-якими питаннями, в якості основної причини занепокоєння вказала на можливі проблеми з дозволом на перетин лінії розмежування. Це може бути викликано тим, що люди зіткнулися зі складною процедурою подання документів, як на КПВВ «Новотроїцьке». Крім того, 30% респондентів назвали причиною свого занепокоєння відсутність фізичної дистанції.
  • Протягом січня 3 695 вразливих осіб похилого віку отримали допомогу в транспортуванні на КПВВ «Станиця Луганська» електромобілем від НУО «Проліска».

Документ можна завантажити українською та англійською.

Звіт містить інформацію, зібрану БФ «Право на захист» в межах опитування, що регулярно проводиться з червня 2017 року. КПВВ розташовані в Донецькій («Майорське», «Мар’їнка», «Гнутове» та «Новотроїцьке») та Луганській («Станиця Луганська») областях. Опитування є частиною моніторингу порушення прав населення, що постраждало від конфлікту, та проводиться в межах проекту «Адвокація, захист та правова допомога внутрішньо переміщеним особам України», що реалізується БФ «Право на захист» за підтримки Агентства ООН у справах біженців (UNHCR). Таке опитування має на меті з’ясувати причини, умови та ризики, які супроводжують перетин лінії зіткнення через КПВВ. Зібрана під час опитування інформація допоможе визначити потреби, прогалини та тенденції, а також забезпечити доказову базу для діяльності з адвокації.    

Звіт «Перетин лінії розмежування через КПВВ», січень 2021 року

Читайте також:

05.02.21

In context of the decentralization reform a new administrative division system was approved in Ukraine in the mid of 2020. 1469 new territorial communities appeared on the map of the country.

To increase the efficiency of public administrations, the system of districts was optimized and instead of 490 “old” districts, 136 “new” districts were formed. Thus, the preconditions were made for an organization of the local elections in October 2020 on a new administrative division.

However since 2014 many settlements in Donetsk and Luhansk regions have been divided by the “contact line”. Due to non-compliance with international standards of security and democratic electoral process, the next and first local elections in October 2020 failed to be held.

On August 8, 2020, the Central Election Commission of Ukraine (CEC) adopted Resolution № 161, which approved a list of communities where local elections cannot be held. It included 10 villages, settlements and city councils of Donetsk region and 8 in the Luhansk region. Territorial communities where no local elections were held got into a legal collapse, as they could not fully exercise local self-government in order to approve the budget, to open accounts in the treasury, etc. 

In January 2021, some employees of the village, settlement, district, and city councils were not paid their salaries, the funding of educational and cultural institutions stopped due to non-payment of utilities, all the important facilities were on the verge of disconnection from gas and heat supply, administrative service centers have closed down, making it impossible to obtain social services, etc.

Decentralization in Ukraine. Problems and opportunities in Donetsk and Luhansk regions

“Such problems are not uncommon and diverse. Not only citizens, but also representatives of local government have questions to which there are no answers. The only positive solution in the current circumstances will be the establishment of civil-military administrations (CMA) in such territories. Therefore, conditions for the creation of the CMA were changed. ”

said Alla Skvortsova, lawyer of the Severodonetsk office of the Right to Protection CF.

Relevant amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On Civil-Military Administrations” entered into force on January 14, 2021. Now it is possible to create a CMA not only if local councils do not fulfill their tasks, but also if the CEC has decided that it is impossible to hold local elections in the community. Now the last word is left to the President of Ukraine as the amended version of the law was sent to him for signature.


UNHCR Ukraine – Aгентство ООН у справах біженців в Україні

Also read:

02.02.21

Experts of the Right to Protection CF (R2P), within the framework of the Prepare Prevent Protect (3P) Consortium (ACTED,  IMPACT Initiatives, R2P, the Danish, Austrian and Ukrainian Red Cross Societies) jointly with the Ministry for Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine have prepared the recommendations for public authorities on the protection of the population of eastern Ukraine from the risks of environmental and industrial-driven disasters.

The document contains important and detailed information addressed to the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, the Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine, the Ministry for Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine and the State Emergency Service on risks prevention.

Due to the destruction of many industrial and residential buildings as a result of the hostilities in the Donbas in Ukraine, there is a constant risk of emergencies that pose a threat to the population and to the environment.

Most of the risks are associated with the presence of a large number of flooded and semi-flooded mines in the Donbas, which in turn are connected by a complex underground system with other mines both in Non-Government and Government-Controlled Areas. Due to the constant movement of groundwater, the risks of flooding of mines and contamination of the sources of clean water increase significantly. This causes irreparable damage to the flora and fauna of the rivers that enter the Siversky Donets basin.

You can download or view the document in .pdf format:


3P Consortium was formed in 2019 by the group of international and Ukrainian NGOs to reduce disaster risk vulnerability in eastern Ukraine. 3P Members of the Consortium are united by their desire to Prepare, Prevent and Protect civilian populations and critical service systems in Ukraine from the risks of natural, ecological and industrial disasters

The recommendations were developed under the project “Reducing Disaster Risk Vulnerability in Eastern Ukraine” with the support of the European Union and the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid. Experts on ecology and environment Yermakov Viktor Mykolayovych and Luniova Oksana Volodymyrivna were directly involved in the development.

Any views expressed in this document should in no way be taken to be an official position of the European Union. The European Commission is not responsible for any use of the information contained therein.

02.02.21

The Coalition of Public Human Rights and Charitable Organizations prepared an analysis of the Draft Law of Ukraine “On the State Policy of the Transition Period”.

The draft law is the first comprehensive publicly presented document devoted to the implementation of state policy in the context of the armed conflict and further deoccupation of the currently occupied territories of Ukraine. Draft covers various areas of public policy, including economics, law, and cybersecurity.

Experts of the Coalition of Non-Governmental Organizations analyzed the text of the bill in detail. The analysis indicated the need of further work on conceptual aspects in order to avoid inconsistencies with the provisions of the Legislation of Ukraine and international norms.

“Together with a coalition of human rights NGOs, we worked on a consolidated analysis of this draft law. It is important to say that this is the first document on the issue of transition policy. The bill defines various areas of state policy to be pursued after the end of hostilities and in the context of deoccupation of territories. At the same time, based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that a number of provisions of this project need significant refinement. ”

– said Elina Shyshkina, advocacy coordinator at Right to Protection CF

You can view and download the Draft Law Analysis in .pdf format (in Ukrainian)

Висновок коаліції НДО щодо проєкту закону про політику перехідного періоду Conclusion of the NGO coalition on the draft law “On the State Policy of the Transition Period”

The conclusion was prepared by experts of the following organizations:

NGO “DonbasSOS”

NGO “KrymSOS” 

Right to Protection CF

Vostok SOS CF

NGO “Civil holding “GROUP OF INFLUENCE”

Stabilization Support Services in Ukraine CF

ZMINA Human Rights Center

Crimean Human Rights Group (CHRG)

27.01.21

Today we present the report: “Resolution #767: Challenges and obstacles for participation in the programme”.

This report is mainly based on the results of the survey about intentions, challenges and obstacles encountered during participation in the compensation programme for damaged/destroyed housing objects launched within CMU resolution №767.

In addition, a significant deal of information was gathered during our monitoring visits to plenty of settlements in Donetska and Luhanska oblasts in the period of October-December.  

Overall, our respondents were surveyed on 826 cases, including 325 on destroyed and 501 on damaged housing objects. 

звіт report damaged housing

Our outreach workers and the legal team also took part in some of the commission assessment sessions either as observers or members, thus they had an opportunity to obtain firsthand experience in the implementation of the programme.

By focusing on the perspective of claimants, this report complements a survey conducted by UNHCR in November 2020, which focuses on the functioning of the local assessment commissions, based on observations from R2P and other NGO members or observers in these commissions.  

R2P launched this survey primarily to find out whether this programme is relevant for its target audience, as well as to reveal the pitfalls of the programme from the perspective of participants.

Therefore, we decided to survey our beneficiaries of IDP and conflict-affected background who reportedly had problems with damaged/destroyed housing objects and those potential beneficiaries whom our outreach workers already knew or got to know during field trips.

The survey has been conducted in the period of October-November in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts via phone and face-to-face interviews. Besides, upon the completion of the survey, some cases were directed to R2P legal team for further investigation.

As a result, our team not only conducted research but also promptly provided assistance to those who were willing to participate in the programme but for some reason experienced difficulties with applying for monetary compensation/assistance.

The report is available in

English and Ukrainian


UNHCR Ukraine – Aгентство ООН у справах біженців в Україні

Also read:

26.01.21

Ukraine is a signatory to the Convention on Status of Refugees. Article 33 of this document prohibits extradition of a person to the frontiers of territories where his/her life or freedom would be threatened on account of his/her race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion. The same principle is enshrined in the Ukrainian legislation, particularly in the Criminal Procedure Code in the section on extradition.

 It is prohibited in Ukraine:

  • to send;
  • to extradite;
  • to forcibly return not only recognized refugees, but also persons who have applied for international protection (asylum seekers).

If another state applies to Ukraine with an official request for extradition, then an extradition check is mandatory.  It must be established whether there are circumstances that prevent the extradition of a person.

If a person applied to the State Migration Service of Ukraine with an application for refugee status or appealing a negative decision on his/her application, then this fact must be established during the extradition checking. In this case, the migration procedure will be the main argument for non extradition of a person.

The extradition procedure consists of the several stages:

  • another state makes an official appeal to Ukraine;
  • extradition checking;
  • decision on the extradition request (which can be appealed in court);
  • extradition.

The complexity of the procedure requires qualified legal assistance.

If you are a protection seeker and you are concerned that extradition may be initiated against you, be sure to inform your lawyer about that. In case extradition begins, legal assistance is essential.

More on this topic:

Check out Refugee Helper chatbot page on Facebook for more useful information


UNHCR Ukraine – Aгентство ООН у справах біженців в Україні

25.01.21

On December 23, 2020, the Government amended the Procedure for Provision of Temporary Use of Housing from Housing Funds for Temporary Accommodation of Internally Displaced Persons, approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 582 of June 26, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as the “Procedure”). Changes came into force on December 30, 2020.

The team of the CF “Right to Protection” has analyzed the document. So, what are the main changes?

1. Abolition of Requirements on the Term of a Person’s Registration in the Unified Information Database on Internally Displaced Persons 

The abolition of requirements on the term of a person’s registration in the Unified Information Database on Internally Displaced Persons (hereinafter – the “Information Base”) with a certain social protection authority, as a precondition to providing residence for temporary accommodation, may be viewed as one of the most important amendments to the Procedure.

According to the previous version of clause 6 of the Procedure, an internally displaced person had to apply for registration as a citizen in need of housing from the housing funds for temporary accommodation (the “Registration”) to an authorized body within the area of service of a certain social protection authority, where such person has been registered in the Information Base during a year

Similarly, as set out in the previous version of the second paragraph of clause 1 of the Procedure, the internally displaced persons and their family members were provided with accommodation at a place of actual residence / stay within the service area of ​​the relevant authorities where they have been registered in the Information Database during a year.

Currently, the IDPs are no longer required to be registered in the Information Base by a certain social protection authority for a period of one year in order to start the process of Registration and obtaining accommodation for temporary residence.

Are there any changes to the accommodation location rules? 

No, the rules governing the place of application for Registration and the territory where the temporary accommodation is granted have not been amended.

As previously, according to clause 6 of the Procedure, the application shall be submitted “to the relevant administrative services center or the relevant local self-government body, and in their absence – to the relevant civil-military administration (hereinafter – the authorized bodies) within the service area of ​​the social protection authority where they are registered in the Unified Information Database on Internally Displaced Persons.

Similarly, the second paragraph of clause 1 of the Procedure sets out that the residence premises are provided to the internally displaced persons “at the place of actual residence / stay within the service area of ​​the district, district in the city state administrations in Kyiv, executive bodies of city councils, in which the said persons and their family members are registered in the Unified Information Database on Internally Displaced Persons.”

In addition, under clause 2 of the Procedure on the Formation of Housing Funds for Temporary Residence of the Internally Displaced Persons, approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 582 of 26.06.2019, which has not been further amended, “residence premises from the funds must comply with the sanitary and technical  requirements and be located within an administrative-territorial unit (district, city, district in the city, town, village) at the place of actual residence / stay of an internally displaced person.”

Therefore, in view of the above, the territory where the temporary accommodation may be granted still remains limited and directly depends on the service area of the authorities in which the internally displaced persons are registered in the Information Base. Providing them with possibility to obtain residential premises anywhere in Ukraine, where such premises are available, will require further amendments to the legislation.

2. Extending the Term for Resolving on Registration

The term for the authorized bodies to resolve on Registration / refusal in Registration of an internally displaced person, set out in clause 18 of the Procedure, has been extended.  Previously this period constituted 10 days. Now the relevant decision must be approved by the authorized body within 30 calendar days from the date the housing commission on registration of the internally displaced persons and granting residential premises to internally displaced persons for temporary accommodation (hereinafter – the “Commission”) provides its conclusion in respect of a person.

3. De-registration of the Internally Displaced Persons

Introducing the grounds for De-registration of an internally displaced person (i.e., excluding a person from the list of citizens in need of housing from the housing funds for temporary accommodation) is one of the most crucial novelties included in the Procedure.

According to clause 20 of the Procedure, the grounds for De-registration are as follows:

  • application of an internally displaced person for De-registration;
  • change of the place of residence by a person;
  • cancellation of the certificate on registration of a person as an internally displaced person on grounds set out in part 1 of Article 12 of the Law of Ukraine “On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of the Internally Displaced Persons”;
  • failure to receive a move-in permission (housing order), without a valid reason, within 30 calendar days, or a failure to notify, within the same term, about the valid reasons preventing them from receiving a move-in permission;
  • submission of deliberately false information that formed the grounds for Registration.

Particular attention in this case should be paid to the matters of untimely obtaining the move-in permission, as well as the failure to timely notify the authorized bodies on the valid reasons preventing a person from receiving it.

According to the Procedure, the decision on De-registration must indicate its grounds and may be challenged in court.

However, the question of notification of the internally displaced person on his / her De-registration remain unclear. Unlike the provisions of clause 19 of the Procedure, which directly define the term and manner of notifying the IDPs on their Registration / refusal in Registration, the Procedure does not establish the manner and terms for notifying a person on his/her De-registration.  Resolving this matter will require approval of further amendments to the Procedure.

4. Move-in Permission Obtaining Issues

Amendments to clause 30 of the Procedure providing for extension of the list of people entitled to receive the move-in permission will have a positive impact. 

Previously the Procedure permitted its obtaining only by the person, to whom it was issued. However, now it may also be received by the authorized representative of an internally displaced person based on a written power of attorney certified in the manner set forth by law.

New rules introduced by clause 30 of the Procedure also establish that “when an internally displaced person or his/her authorized representative has not received a move-in permission within 30 calendar days, without a valid reason, or has not notified, within the same period of time, about the valid reasons preventing them from receiving the move-in permission, they shall be deprived of the right to obtain the property move-in permission, and the internally displaced person shall be deprived of the right to move in the premises, which shall not deprive the internally displaced person of the right to re-apply for registration.” This also forms grounds for holding a meeting of the Commission in order to resolve on allocation the relevant premises to other internally displaced persons.

According to the Procedure, reasons that do not depend on the will of the internally displaced person or his/her authorized representative are considered valid.

5. Priority Criteria for the Allocation of Premises to the IDPs

The priority of providing housing to internally displaced persons is determined based on the number of points scored by the relevant person / family, in accordance with the scoring system established by the Procedure.

As previously established, the points are accrued according to the criteria stipulated by the Procedure. They include (i) the priority criteria, according to which the points are scored to a family with the highest indicator (e.g., families with two children – 26 points; families with one child – 25 points; families including expectant mothers – 24 points), and (ii) general criteria, according to which the points are scored in case there are relevant grounds (e.g., large families – 2 points per family; families with incapable persons – 2 points per family; persons authorized to perform the functions of the state or local self-government from among the internally displaced persons – 3 points per person).

However, the amendments to clause 25 of the Procedure stipulate that the authorized body may approve a list of additional general criteria, the total number of points for which may not exceed 20 points per family.

Thus, it is necessary to note that additionally establishing various general criteria by some of the authorized bodies may potentially result in the loss of equality in treating the internally displaced persons in Ukraine and providing more favorable treatment to certain categories of IDPs. 

6. Extension of Term of the Premises Use

As previously, clause 32 of the Procedure sets out that the residential premises are provided to the internally displaced persons in temporary use for the period of up to one year, which may be extended for the next period in case their status does not change and unless they acquire another place of residence.

For this purpose, a person must file an application (the name of the application was changed to the “application for extension of the term of granting the residential premises from the housing funds for the temporary accommodation of the internally displaced persons”), together with the documents set out in clause 8 of the Procedure, with the authorized body.

The deadline for submitting the application has been changed.  Currently, it must be submitted to the authorized body not later than 60 calendar days prior to the expiration of the premises use agreement (previously it had to be filed not later than 30 calendar days prior to the agreement expiration date).

The Commission must consider the application not later than 50 calendar days prior to the expiration of the premises use agreement and notify the applicant in writing on its conclusion. The authorized body will resolve on extension of the term of granting premises for the temporary accommodation, based on the Commission’s conclusion, not later than the expiration date of the relevant agreement (the restriction “within two working days from the date of receipt of the conclusion of the commission” was excluded from the Procedure).

7. New Grounds for the Pre-Term Termination of the Agreement on Granting Residential Premises

The list of grounds for the Commission to resolve on the pre-term termination of granting the premises to IDPs for temporary accommodation, set out in clause 45 of the Procedure, was extended and now includes the following: 

  – in case an IDPdoes not reside in the premisescontinuously for more than a half of the term for which the premises use agreement was made. This fact shall be evidenced by the information  provided by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, National Police, as well from other executive bodies, on the return of the relevant person to the temporarily occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk Regions, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol, other communities where the state authorities of Ukraine do not temporarily exercise their powers, or relocation of the person abroad.


Earlier we told that our colleagues from the Severodonetsk office participated in the Work meeting on the amendments to the resolution on housing for IDPs.